Saying Nothing in Stereo. Tools as Novella.

2008 December 29
by Dave Johnston

Tools. Blur.

A large section of the internet today reminds me of the guy at your high school in 1984, out in the student parking lot, talking endlessly about the awesome new stereo in his red Camaro Z28. He spends much more time in that parking lot showing everyone his massive kicker box and bad ass set of tweeters than he does actually using them.

And when he does use them, it’s primarily so everyone else can hear it.

You know this guy. In fact, you might have been this guy, or girl (Sony made pink Walkmans). I’m sure at some point I might have been this guy, but about ten years down the road.

The other day I gave my used iPod Nano to my 8 year old nephew as an unexpected gift.  

His first response was, “Cool!  Let’s put some songs on it!”  

Shockingly, he didn’t immediately ask me whether it had Ken Burns Effect styling in the menus.  When he noticed that it switched to landscape mode, 400 words didn’t flow out of his mouth.  If I remember right he just looked at me and said, “Nice.”  I also observed that he didn’t run off right away to write an outraged blog post about the lack of FireWire-based charging.

He wanted to go use it right away.  For music.

You put music on it.

It only takes a few moments observing children using our latest technology to realize that those of us in the 25 to 45 age bracket (those over 45 rarely even know where the “ON” button is, studies show) have it all wrong.  We’re hung up on all this wizardry because it’s something shiny and new.  The reality is that we’re actually the children in this story. Most of the time our own children simply get use out of these devices, while we tinker around on the edges.  While we’re looking to create a narrative out of the design, or the specs, they’re looking for the product’s intended purpose: usage.

Remember your reaction the first time you saw the penguins at the zoo?  That’s it.  Same human wiring. 

On some level technology freaks us all out. It’s what happens when human beings (adult, the overthinking ones) are confronted with new stuff, new ideas. Especially with communication devices. These often force us to think about allowing other humans to do their own thing, which could result in having to acknowledge weird ideas that exist outside our normal zone. 

So we want to talk about it.  A lot.

Johann Gutenberg – His press was a revolution at the time, to put it lightly. He spent about a decade struggling on it in secret before it was ready to work properly. When it was finally functional Gutenberg didn’t immediately print out a guide on how to use the printing press itself. He printed a poem, then church materials and possibly some Latin texts, at least according to most accounts. I’m somewhat amazed by this, although I wasn’t there so I’ll never know. There’s at least an outside chance he printed that guide. But the bottom line is that I haven’t heard any of my friends mention Johann Gutenberg’s name in the past ten years. They have read a lot of magazines though.

Alexander Graham Bell – Think back to 1876 (you weren’t alive, but just try), when Bell called to Watson on the first telephone call.  Wild stuff. I’m sure it took many years post-invention for the public to stop going crazy about the new technology and simply start making calls to each other. Today we don’t pick up the phone, dial our friend, then talk for 90 minutes about how we got the phone to deliver our voice all the way to California from Indianapolis. We just conduct our business. That’s a good thing.

Try to imagine right now an entire blog, updated 24/7, with ten authors dedicated completely to your (or your parents, since you don’t have one) home phone.  Yeah, that one.  The one with the cord going to the wall.  Post after post every day about how you can get a dial tone when you pick up the receiver, how if you push Flash it switches to a different call, the Top Ten Ways You Can Use Memory Dial to Organize Your Life, etc.  Sounds like a pretty terrible blog, doesn’t it?

Now you know how I feel. 

Swirling rumors. Whooosh!

Think this all sounds ridiculous?  You’re saying, “But Dave, I love reading all my tech blogs every day, even if they all publish the same story over and over.  You’re cramping my style, bro. Why are you trying to squash my mojo?

Because you’re wasting time at work.  That’s what this is.  It’s a time sink.  And – even if only transitively – you’re clogging up my internet with a lot of unnecessary words.  Words that you, I, and everyone else could allocate to other stuff.  Other stuff like say…stem cell research. Or comedy.

But there’s no way you could possibly be in this category, right?  You’re not stuck in the glow of tech, you’re above that.  That’s somebody else’s problem.  No. I’d bet against it. I’d bet you just haven’t thought it out, watch this video:

 

That commecial comes off as pretty silly in 2008, doesn’t it?  A commercial celebrating electronic switching?  Switching as in how the phone lines route data?  

Electronic switches. Fascinating. And they’re installing them at a rate of ONE PER BUSINESS DAY!

(1980 Bell installers FTW)

The kid in the commercial is you, 1980 version.  Or maybe you’re the dad. I haven’t run it through the rules of analogy. Maybe I’m the guy actually on the phone as they walk by. Whatever. Either way, we were “taking your telephone into the 21st Century” by upgrading the phone line.  Words, pictures, numbers. The birth of Caller ID, Call Waiting, and other phone services. It was a pretty big deal.  Was.  Now it’s not.

I could talk about Twitter or any other of an endless number of tools or Web 2.0 services, but let’s just take WordPress as one quick example of this happening right now.  

Stating the case: I’m pretty sure more blogs about WordPress and its various themes and plugins exist than actual blogs using it as software to, you know, write.  

Of course most of these WordPress blogs do use WordPress itself, so my argument is subject to a perverse black hole collapse onto itself if thought about too intensely (please don’t). And I can only say I’m “pretty sure,” because I haven’t yet read a Forrester Research study on the topic.  Until that happens, nobody can really know.

I want to go see the penguins.

Believe me, I appreciate the fact that – when we need it – there is a great deal of information available on how to use WordPress.  I’ve learned from these resources many times. I am not impugning a continent here. But do a Google search for “WordPress themes” and you can click through to page 60 and still be at top-level results (I stopped at 60, feel free to keep going). Have you ever been past page 10 on Google? People rarely go past page 1 or 2.

Imagine the brain power going into all these WordPress sites. Brain power that could be used on anything, but is going into blogging widgetry. The time and effort, the late nights up toiling in PHP. The Photoshop crashes, the coffee binges, the evenings blown by in IM trying to get an answer from your friend in Canada doing the exact same thing. It’s all meant for you to use to set up your site, and 99% of the time – for free.

And at some point, after twenty straight days of tweaking themes and plugins and widgets and flimflams, you’re going to be left with one thing on WordPress: a piece of digital paper.  

No more, no less.  

You are supposed to write on it.

Something. Anything.

Just not 1000 words on how to use a hammer.

Because you would never write that in a million years. Right?

We are the generation that talks about technology. The next will actually use it.

 

 

Two images in this post used via Creative Commons License. Original laptop image can be found here, penguins at zoo image here.

36 Responses leave one →
  1. 2008 December 29
    Yechmeme permalink

    Dude your wordpress template sucks! Where is your blogline widget?

  2. 2008 December 29

    Ah, a voice crying in the wilderness– like St. John preaching to the damned in Hades.

    I like the plain-spoken, no nonsense style.

    I’d rather eat locusts and honey in the midst of a ‘wasteland’ than caviar in Silicon Valley.

    They’re more nutritious, anyway.

    They know me in Fairmount. I was the guy in boots and a cowboy hat who kept slipping on the linoleum in the diner.

    At least all the farmers in their overalls liked the music I played on the jukebox.

    Hah, I even read James Whitcomb Riley.

  3. 2008 December 29

    I knew you were something special the first time I read your stuff.

  4. 2008 December 29

    “We are the generation that talks about technology. The next will actually use it.”

    The “talk” of technology just happens to have a new bullhorn right now. That’s all it is. There are plenty of people using technology and it isn’t waiting for the next generation per se.

    It’s more a question of technology being the response to a perceived need. Or, will the next generation truly need the technology or simply leap frog it over again?

    Example: The explosion of TV programming and channels of video content and a magazine for just about everything.

    20 years ago for me, 321 Contact on PBS didn’t solve the ills of the world… but it got my attention and a lot of other peoples’ attention piqued as to the possibilities.

    Now? I don’t watch TV.

    Instead, I can get my 321 Contact moments just from about anywhere. Why? The YouTube has delivered lots of things…. crap yes but often more tutorial and insight than not having YouTube would provide.

    p.s. great post

  5. 2008 December 29
    Jackie permalink

    That commercial is fantastic, D.

    And does what you’re saying apply to Leo Laporte? Say it aint’ so!

  6. 2008 December 29

    I agree with you when you talk about the ‘techcrunch’ crowd.. however, people have been using listserves and bloggish type things for going on two+ decades now to get research and real work done. I remember very well being in my mothers office (she was a professor at us college) and seeing her messaging colleagues over fidonet, and over newer and better networked tech’s over the years as moores law went to work. at the same time there were people on usenet talking about how great usenet is, as well as fidonet groups doing the same thing, as well as any technology. There will always be the geek/nerd fanboyset that plays with technology for the sake of its existence and others that use it as a tool because they have more interesting things to do with their time.

    just as their was the kid with the tricked out stereo that showed it off, there was the kid getting laid in the backseat with a nice big wattage high fidelity stereo as well. just depends where your passion is. what you do with your life, or the things you try to amass to find something to do.

  7. 2008 December 29

    Love it! Well said.

    Thanks for pointing out what ’seems’ obvious… yet eludes us!

    I once had a wonderful Spirit Coach who said… “At some point you gotta get past the ‘Oooh, Aaah’ of God’s miracles and step into the miracle!”

    Good advice… and a nice ‘catch’ ;-)

    –Mary K

    ¸..· ´¨¨)) -:¦:-
    ¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
    ((¸¸.·´ ..·´ -:¦:-
    -:¦:- ((¸¸.·´* Light

    EXPECT MIRACLES! (cause you GET what you expect!)

  8. 2008 December 29
    Dave Johnston permalink

    Jackie…you know my opinion on Leo. He’s in a whole category to himself. He was part of creating the entire niche genre. Successful radio guy, etc. Actually helps people solve real problems on the radio show. Almost a legend at this point.

    The problem is not Leo.

  9. 2008 December 30
    Dave Johnston permalink

    @adam helfgott

    See response to Jackie above RE: Leo

    The kids in the backseat…you’re right. The Valley has its own version of that too.

  10. 2008 December 30

    I’ve had an argument with my boss over something similar. He brags that it’s his generation who INVENTED all this stuff (he’s almost 50, and I think he’s lumping himself in with everyone 10 years older and younger, so we’ll say 40-60), but I insist it’s my generation (I’m 30, so on the cusp of being too old to consider it still my generation) who actually know how to USE the stuff.

    I hope I always take my cues regarding technology from the younger generation.

  11. 2008 December 30

    @dave – so are all these tards really a problem? or will they just be ignored as they turn their attention towards what the real innovators produce next anyways? I mean sure its annoying, but who cares. there will always be early adopters who will learn to profit legitimately off new tech, as well fan boy culture dont you think? were always going to be in a vetting out process of new technologies and ways to disseminate information. there will always be people that REALLY REALLY give a shit if its beta or vhs, hddvd or blueray, wordpress or and email list or whatever the fuck. And there will always be people who just use the tool that works best at that moment given the variables/circumstances in their life at the moment – mostly non technological… and probably mostly coincidental.

  12. 2008 December 30

    1000 words on how to use a hammer….fantastic!

  13. 2008 December 30

    good post, thanks for the reminder.

  14. 2008 December 30

    For kicks I once wrote: “9 Steps to Speed Up Broadband Firefox Browsing.”

    It works – speeds up your browser refresh rate. Spawned a deluge of visits in the tens of thousands – for months. Silliest waste of my time, ever.

    Then I wrote: “Process: Secrets of The One-Handed Clap Revealed” detailing, in minutia, how I clap with a single hand – either hand. Not so popular. Second silliest waste of a post, ever. But the cathartic benefits of writing it saved that one for me. :)

    We should have lunch one day, Dave – text technology redundancies across the table on our iPhones and Blackberries. :)

  15. 2008 December 30
    Dave Johnston permalink

    Very nice, Ed. I could use some speed browser tips. But I’m going to need more than 9.

    At lunch, you can text. I’ll have the texts routed to GTalk and then respond in IM. Or maybe I’ll TwitterFone verbally and then it can get converted to @ messages to you on Twitter, which you can read via Twitterrific.

  16. 2008 December 30

    Oh, mercy. The idea of a lunch with Ed and Dave is like… wow. Especially with the addition of redundant technologies. I’d have to be a part of it via IM. Or text. Or perhaps Facebook message.

    I COMPLETELY agree about the echo chamber that is the “talking about technology” space. All the blogs covering all the same stories and linking back to one another in some sort of massive geeky circle jerk. Which is not a term I’ve ever used in a comment box, and slightly untoward, but is there a better way to put it? Maybe “inside baseball.” But that’s kind of insulting to baseball.

    I’ve twittered about it a bunch of times, but that’s kind of meta-ironic, isn’t it? Twittering about blogs about technology talking about technology too much. Whoa.

    By the way, when I saw penguins live for the first time (2007), I cried like a dork. I LOVE THEM.

  17. 2008 December 30
    Jackie permalink

    If you mouse over the pics, heehee!

  18. 2008 December 30

    Heh dude I’m in the ‘totally over the freakin’ hill’ age bracket. I can find the on button and – scarily – I can still find my ass. Which is a lot more than can be said of many of those who clog up the interwebs. (PS – I stopped looking at TechMeme about 6 months ago)

  19. 2008 December 31
    Todd permalink

    While I can appreciate your point and even agree with it, my initial reaction was that they are 2 different audiences with different needs and goals.

    Advanced users talk about advanced things, they deep dive on their tools, they push their uses to the limits, and benefit from that investment. The sharing and discussing of that learning is just part of the process, imo.

    Simple users just use it and move on, often if their use is less than optimal because they haven’t mastered it or looked deeper.

    So while your point is well taken and does have merit, it feels a little overstated too me, perhaps.

    But again, I do agree from a personal philosophy, its why I’ve mostly bought Apple products, because they tend to get out of my way and do what I want with the less amount of hassle or fuss. Its the same reason I abandoned Linux years ago.

    Anyways, here’s to a great 2009 and technology that gets so good that it gets out of the way so we can just use it without discussing it endlessly!

  20. 2008 December 31

    Dave,

    Brilliant. And at first I agreed 100% — so sick of hearing people talk about followers on Twitter or the latest minor tweak to Facebook — but there one defense to those now obsessed with new technology.

    For the first time humans are starting to become attached to networks. Phones and fax machines may have started the process, but the recent explosion in social networks has expanded our ability to connect with others.

    This is a revolution, and people are struggling to figure it out. Our Dunbar number of maximum relationships is moving from 150 to perhaps 1,500, and the tenfold increase makes the head swim.

    Do we use technology to gather more information? Extend our influence to others? Become virtual in our human relationships?

    The inputs and outputs have expanded and shifted, and as people ponder this new change in how our minds perceive the world, we are of course fascinated by the tools that make it possible.

    So for a while yet, we will continue to obsess over shiny glass objects and glowing screens. It may only be typing, video and sound, but our minds’ links to the universe have expanded, and that’s a trip.

  21. 2008 December 31
    Dave Johnston permalink

    @Ben Kunz

    Good comment, and I agree for the most part. This is a revolution and I’m glad to see it happening. I have benefited (and will continue to) from the development and continued advancement of these tools. They’ve landed me jobs and work, allowed me to be more productive, etc.

    If there is a goal in mind for my piece – which was written from a macro perspective, and with a humorous tinge – it’s that some of us might just need to step back for a moment and gain some perspective. Perspective that could possibly allow us to use our minds for bigger and better things…using these very tools.

  22. 2008 December 31

    Interesting post, not sure I agree 100%, but good food for thought.

    All I could think though was:

    http://bit.ly/4lWK

    Google Fight: “powered by wordpress” vs. “wordpress themes”

  23. 2008 December 31
    Dave Johnston permalink

    Fun link Matt.

    How about this one:

    http://bit.ly/2OUP

    Another Google Fight.

  24. 2008 December 31

    Well, you got me there. That is kinda sad.

  25. 2008 December 31

    *shrug* I seems excessive, I’m sure, but to me it’s like a library: I could go there, read a few books on typography and be happy. At some point I begin to think “Why the heck is there a whole two floors devoted to analyzing poetry? It’s all boring, redundant, and obvious observation.”

    But then some English major will sit down with a poetry analysis book, make good headway on writing a research paper or some such, and think, “Why is there a whole section of books about lettering?!”

    Really, in a place where space is nearly unlimited, and no one is required to read anything they don’t want to, why would you not encourage everyone to produce everything they are compelled to make? Someone will find a lot of benefit in it, I promise.

  26. 2008 December 31

    Well said.

    I wasn’t “That Guy” in 1984 (I drove a 1981 Chevy Chevette to high school that year, not a Camaro or Corvette) but I sure knew the type, and they sure are proliferating here online, esp. in places like Twitter.

    People get too hung up on the “stuff-ness” of stuff and not the “neat” of it. The example of your nephew was a great one. Kids know that stuff is to be used, not endlessly chattered about.

  27. 2008 December 31

    I’d rather read 1000 words on novel ways to use a hammer, though.

  28. 2008 December 31
    Jackie permalink

    I would read 1000 words by DJ any day, Vidar. But I’m pretty biased.

  29. 2009 January 2
    Tim Young permalink

    Great post. Since I drove a 1981 Plymouth Reliant (with “whorehouse velour” seats no less) I wasn’t in the “That Guy” category either in 1984, but like Stephen I knew the type very well.

    You just got another reader! Keep up the great work.

  30. 2009 January 3

    This resonates with me, as it explains in ways I haven’t thoroughly thought out why: a) gadget/web2.0 blogs bore me stiff b) as a programmer, ‘computer people’ who talk about THE COMPUTERS THEMSELVES bore me stiff.

    As my man Edsgar Dijkstra once said: ‘computer science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes’. (Although it does indicate computer science is a very poor choice of a name, but witness the rise of Informatics).

  31. 2009 August 30

    I never ever post but this time I will,Thanks alot for the great blog.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Saying Nothing in Stereo. Tools as Novella. | PHP-Blog.com
  2. Saying Nothing in Stereo. Tools as Novella. | Dave Johnston | Voices | AllThingsD
  3. Talking about Technology vs USING Technology
  4. Dave Johnston makes me love the web again - Cool Tweeps on Twitter: MaTweeps
  5. “This is the Price and the Promise of Citizenship” « teng time

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS